Governing Scientific Accountability in China

Outputs and resources

Resources

Publication 1-Credibility Paradox

3 February 2015

Zhang, JY (2015) ‘The “Credibility Paradox” in China’s Science Communication: Views from Scientific Practitioners’, Public Understanding of Science, 24(8), 913-927 [SAGE Choice article. Free access at: http://pus.sagepub.com/content/24/8/913]

 

In contrast to increasing debates on China's rising status as a global scientific power, issues of China's science communication remain under-explored. Based on 21 in-depth interviews in three cities, this article examines Chinese scientists' accounts of the entangled web of influence which conditions the process of how scientific knowledge achieves (or fails to achieve) its civic authority. A main finding of this study is a 'credibility paradox' as a result of the over-politicisation of science and science communication in China. Respondents report that an absence of visible institutional endorsements renders them more public credibility and better communication outcomes. Thus, instead of exploiting formal channels of science communication, scientists interviewed were more keen to act as 'informal risk communicators' in grassroots and private events. Chinese scientists' perspectives on how to earn public support of their research sheds light on the nature and impact of a 'civic epistemology' in an authoritarian state.

 

Telephone: +44(0)1227 827574 or email us

SSPSSR, Faculty of Social Sciences, Cornwallis North East, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF

Last Updated: 06/02/2015

Image by Steve Jurvetson